![]() ![]() (Secure) Random UUIDsĪlong comes UUIDs - you're probably used to seeing them now, values like this UUIDv4: People can still technically check them all (the guessing space is 1 to MAX_RANDOM_USER_ID!).The keyspace is fairly small (maybe good for comments on a popular website, but not for IDs!).These numbers are random and quite inscrutable.But having values like 5832916 get generated are cool and all, but there are a few problems: Now we have a secure random value coming in for our user IDs. This means we can happily go back to using integer/ biginteger: Postgres 10 added support for the IDENTITY column syntax in CREATE TABLE (EDB has a great writeup on the addition). not SQL standards compliant)ĭon't be too put off by these reasons - serial is still the go-to for most use-cases.Įven the last point about serial not being standards compliant is solved in Postgres 10+ by using. When used from outside code serial may leak some data or give attackers an edge (e.x., if /users/50 works, how about /users/51?).if an INSERT was rolled back - sequences live outside transactions). When writing automation that simply iterates through id values, note that serial columns can have gaps, even if you never DELETE (e.x. ![]() We've taken a somewhat meandering path to get here, but this is the standard solution for most reasonable database schemas. Multiple application instances don't need to coordinate what ID to use - they just don't, and find out from the database. What's the first way you might think of identifying things? Assigning them numbers!īack in application land, the INSERT statement returns, and provides the new id the database assigned our new row. Let's think about identifying rows of data from first principles. A brief history of identifiers and why we use them integer/ biginteger How can we get these UUIDs into postgres?īut first, a quick history lesson.If we choose to use/add UUIDs, which ones should we choose?.Turns out the question of which identifier (and in this case, UUID) to use is complicated - we're going to dive into some of the complexity and inherent trade-offs, and figure things out: Sometimes it makes sense to use a “natural key” (like an email column in a users table) and sometimes it's better to use a “ surrogate key”, a value made for the purpose of identifying a row (and has no other meaning).Īt first glance, the question of which primary key to use is easy! Just throw a integer/ serial on there, right? Numeric IDs are cool, but what about random value IDs or Universally Unique IDentifiers (UUIDs)? The job of a database is to archive and recall data and you're going to have a hard time finding data without a good primary key or a good index. They uniquely identify rows of data in tables, and make it easy to fetch data. SasUUIDPort/sasUUIDService and sasUUIDNode (when it is not installed on Windows) attributes.Īll other sasSpawner definition requirements must be met.įor an example of the metadata needed to define a spawner for UUID generation, refer to the UUID Generator configuration file example.Primary keys are important. UUIDGEND is configured by the sasSpawner object class Separate spawner to support UUIDGEND only, or you can update an existing spawner instance to support UUIDGEND along with its The UUID node must be unique per UUIDGEND installation in order for UUIDGEND to guarantee truly unique UUIDs. If you install UUIDGEND on a host other than Windows, you need to contact SAS Technical UUIDs, install UUIDGEND and identify its location (see SAS UUIDGENDHOST and UUIDCOUNT options documentation) to yourĮxecuting SAS application. If your SAS application executes on a platform other than Windows and your application requires unique The UUID Generator Daemon (UUIDGEND) generates unique UUIDs for SAS sessions that execute on hosts without native Initializing UNIX Environment Variables for Workspace Servers ![]() Setting up an IOM Bridge Server and SpawnerĬreating the Metadata for an IOM Bridge ServerĬonfiguring and Starting the Object Spawner on z/OS ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |